I had worked this specific area for the last 12yrs yet as I approached the gates of this building I knew I had never been in here before. An armed soldier peered into the car and satisfied my partner and I “looked” like bona fide cops he raised the barrier and directed us to a parking spot. I slid my Volvo T5 alongside a colleagues Omega saloon. Two advanced police patrol cars and both less than 6 months old. In most of the city they would not look out of place but here surrounded by Green Goddess fire engines from ages past it was like putting a Sinclair Spectrum alongside a MacBook.

I had pulled into the local TA barracks. This was the bronze control point to provide navigational assistance and on scene support to the army who were providing cover during a national Fire Brigade strike.

I was working overtime and getting paid double time for this easy 12hr shift. I walked into the lounge area where we would wait for a job and was introduced to our crew. I shook hands and exchanged pleasantries with four 17-18 year old lads. They all looked far too young to be soldiers let alone stand in firemen. These kids were earning peanuts and hadn’t joined the army for this. One of my colleagues sat around broadcasting how much he was earning. This distasteful behaviour led to a number of us “encouraging” him to start up a fund we could all pay into on every shift to pay for a night of drinks for these young lads when the strike was over. He did, we raised a substantial figure and the young soldiers went out for the night FOC on us.

Most of this shift I sat doing nothing, either in the barracks or at one of the two minor callouts we had but it gave me plenty of time to think. It gave me time to realise that all emergency services should not have the right to strike. It gave me the opportunity to ponder how millions of £’s of publicly owned fire engines in publicly owned fire stations were sitting idle and young soldiers with no training using a 50+ year old fire engine were providing cover. I became increasingly annoyed with the fire service. The fire service who promote fire safety, the fire service who say they care and the fire service who then abandon those principles and hold the country to ransom when they strike.

Today I posted a few tweets in relation to the strike action by police staff in Nottingham.

The #police cannot strike. Our police staff colleagues can. Where would country be if we could strike? Police now filling in for strikers

Who would fill in for the #police if we could strike? The office of constable needs guaranteed protection. #protectourpolice

There are 1000’s of police staff doing great jobs across the country. They all have one flaw though. They are not police officers.

This leaves us in vulnerable position when they strike that undermines the service we provide. Policing is unique. #protectourpolice

I’ve had some positive responses to the tweets and also some from those who were offended. In order to address the latter we need to go back in history a little. There is much in the media of late regarding austerity measures and making savings but as far as the police are concerned this is not new. There was a time when pretty much every position was staffed by a warranted police officer. Over time as crime rates increased and police officers became less visible whizzing past in cars the public demanded a return to the traditional bobby on the beat. There is a hint of rose tinted spectacles about this but the answer was that warranted officers were an expensive investment and should not therefore be behind desks or in control rooms. The net result was an increase in civillianisation of the police. This has been subject to a name change as many other things and our non-warranted colleagues are now known as police staff. They are invariably paid less for doing the job police officers were previously doing. In some cases even now police officers and staff work alongside each other with hugely different incomes.

The number of police staff has increased over the years and they provide a valuable core function to the service we provide to the public. There are many who are as dedicated to their job and the police as many of my colleagues. They should be applauded. Furthermore as employees (not Crown Servants) they are now in a very difficult place as unlike police officers they can and are being made redundant as the cuts bite.

Unfortunately some of my tweets were taken personally. All of my team are police staff and I hold them all in high esteem. They, like their Nottingham colleagues have the right to strike and I defend and support that right.

The police service is a 24hr, 7 days a week, 365 days a year business. The public need us and when all else fails we are still there. Police officers are a unique role and for the security of the nation we cannot strike.

The traditional role of the constable was to be omni-competent. He/she could cover most roles within the organisation and reserves for control rooms and other functions were in place. Police staff have increased and this tradition has been eroded. This has engendered forces around the country providing an emergency service that is reliant upon police staff… police staff who can strike.

Police forces in a time of strike such as today will struggle to cover those vacant positions with police officers who are adequately trained to use the radios, incident handling, crime and call handling software that are all technical IT systems. It’s simply not a phone with pen and paper anymore. As such forces around the country are exposed to risk. A situation that cost cutting and savings over many years has led to.

It’s not the fault of police officers nor the police staff. I sympathise fully with the predicament police staff are facing and worry about the implications for my team. This situation has arisen through cost cutting over many years. We are now facing even harsher cuts but the preceding years have stripped police officers of many core functions they used to have. So when we are now called upon, as we will be, to cover for striking police staff things are going to get messy. The public may well be at risk.

In any strike, even the miners, there are those who will and those who won’t. Many police staff will and many won’t strike. Yet whilst we have an organisation that runs two different sets of staff with very different rules for each we are going to run into problems at times such as this. Losing 20, 30 or 50% of our overall staffing needs in any time period has the potential to be catastrophic.

Having been very critical of the fire service I find myself angered that the police have been put in a position where we are no better simply because half our workforce operates under separate rules. I repeat myself ;

The police service is a 24hr, 7 days a week, 365 days a year business. The public need us and when all else fails we are still there.

If we don’t have the back up systems we have grown used to then the system will collapse.


6 thoughts on “Striking”

  1. I am a member of police staff in Strathclyde. The situation that we have been placed is not a happy one. I have 36 yrs service. I also work in one of the three area control rooms. Our force announced voluntary redundancy/ retirement packages last year. I applied. Feel I've done my bit but because of the job I do they won't entertain me !! On top of all that they are now trying to take our allowances and expect us to work the same sifts but get the same pay a a 9 – 5 worker. Not really fair is it. I don't agree with striking for the reasons you have outlined on your blog but at the same time we can't let the authorities just walk all over us. We are going to lose out but not without a fight.

  2. Thanks Jan. I find it rather odd that Govt pushed us into increased civillianisation whilst apparently blind-folded. Police staff should have been taken on with similar terms to police in many regards to protect us from the issues we “may” now have to face.

    However this is wonderful hindsight. Police staff have the right to strike and whether they should have had this right or not from the outset is currently annoying but irrelevant. It is a weapon in their armoury to promote fairness and their rights and they should use it where necessary. This is a bed the Govt and chief officers of the day have made and their successors must now lie in it.

  3. Interesting blog. I think you are brave as a serving officer putting these stark thoughts on the net. It is not every officer who would be so candid but probably feels the same way. I have some knowledge of London policing and have been on the receiving end as a “victim” of crime. I agree that the fire service should not strike nor should medics. If only the public knew about the 12 hrs spent awaiting anything to happen at god knows how much an hour paid to a serving PS. I also think that most of the public don't realise that specials have arrest powers. As for the Winsor report that must be sending shivers down spines. And the Federation. Is that a toothless tiger?

    Anon – writing as a spoof twitter account by name of Walter English. See me at @rosettastone57

  4. I know some police officers wont understand that civilians feel the need to strike. Unless you truly feel the threat of redundancy, you get that ‘you are at risk’ paperwork in your hands, its hard to understand. Think about what having your income means, your whole life, your kids, your house, your partner all depend on that salary. Besides seeing that income eroded through inflation and almost no pay rises for several years civilian staff have had the brunt of the cuts. Departments like forensics have been slashed, amalgamated, centralized all to reduce numbers. In ADDITION to no pay rises and reduced staff forces are additionally taking away allowances AND attempting to regrade staff, the outcome predictably to reduce grades. As if that isn’t enough, Winsor is claiming its ‘normal’ to work evenings, weekends, bank holidays…further reducing income by hundreds per month. Those on unsocial hours will be paid almost the same as those in offices simply because one man says that’s the way it is. Personally, I’ve had that letter of being at risk. I managed to keep a job, but lost out in grade, had to work shifts again, my career rise going back 15 years, I’ve been relocated, amalgamated and centralized besides the whole management people being changed to those who want things doing differently and seeing my own department decimated.

    I work alongside police officers every day. Cuts have made their job dangerously under resourced and seen them cram into smaller buildings. Of course I’m talking about rank and file. The hierarchy of course barely complain about cuts and tweet to the public and loyal followers how good everything is. Still retiring on huge pensions whilst civilians pensions are just one other area of our terms and conditions reduced. And I ask for what? Do we actually see anything better for all this personal loss and sacrifice of our income. Sadly not. We are all out there in and out of people’s homes, its quite clear there are millions of those whom we are all paying for.

    Police officers please don’t blame police staff. Many of us have done many years loyal service, barely been sick, and some of us have dealt with the gruesome things, suffered the same abuse and disrespect and been at work all hours including our rest days. We also have the utmost respect for most of you doing your job. If we go on strike, I doubt we will get much public sympathy or understanding from Ms May, but its a protest that things are wrong for us and the police service.

    1. Please don’t get me wrong this is not having a go at police staff. You have a right to strike and I support you in the exercusing of that right.

      This is about how the disparity between officder and staff employment conditions and, over the years, an increased reliance on staff has les to a huge skills gap in police officers.

      That skills gap is irrelevant until strike action takes place. Its almost as though it was set up to fail. We rely on police staff as essential components of the service. Skills we cannot cover if you are not there. Quite possibly the original belief was that in the event of industrial action the cops woukd just step in and cover. Maybe we coukd at first but as time has gone on we are no longer equipped to do that which leaves a gaping hole in the service we provide.

      That’s not for you to worry about or be concerned about. It’s for the top who should be worried about how service provision can be maintained.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s